native HD for 80s music video

Discussion in 'Requests' started by feisty2, Sep 3, 2019.

  1. feisty2

    feisty2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Threads:
    11
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    341
    I found an 80s music video here available in native HD format, it must have been rescanned from the original 35mm film footage. I wonder if we will ever be able to see all pre-HD era videos rescanned to native HD or UHD
     
    agnus2000 likes this.
  2. Loading...


  3. alyssaprimp

    alyssaprimp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2016
    Threads:
    29
    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    2,624
    luckily it's from Sony , their remasters always looks good .well...most of the time
     
  4. feisty2

    feisty2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Threads:
    11
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    341
    a remaster (presumably upscaled from an SD master) is always shitty, what matters is a rescanned copy generated directly from the original 35mm film.
     
  5. ThePixelFarm

    ThePixelFarm Livin' in a dream... Capper Uploader V . I . P. Collector Ripper Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Threads:
    1,128
    Messages:
    4,040
    Likes Received:
    21,670
    Indeed...

    If it exists on film, then it'll need to be, at the very least, 35mm - otherwise, forget it... (like-wise, anything on video, even broadcast formats - prior to HD - forget it...)

    You can't put back, that what don't exist, in the first place... Interpolation, just don't cut it...

    Now, in the future, that might change - but, for now...
     
  6. feisty2

    feisty2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Threads:
    11
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    341
    16mm film (if well preserved) is already good enough for native ~2k resolution. many lower budget music videos seem to have been shot with 16mm film, the rest were generally shot with 35mm cameras like Arri435 (britney spears - toxic/womanizer) or Arri235 (taylor swift - mine) or similar stuff.
     
  7. ThePixelFarm

    ThePixelFarm Livin' in a dream... Capper Uploader V . I . P. Collector Ripper Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Threads:
    1,128
    Messages:
    4,040
    Likes Received:
    21,670
    At the end of the day, we're - you were - talking HD.

    16mm, might only just cut it, for you, but... 35mm, for me, is the least I'd be happy with...
     
  8. feisty2

    feisty2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Threads:
    11
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    341
    sure 35mm comes with more quality than 16mm, but the MTF resolution of 35mm is far beyond HD (1080p), generally:
    70mm corresponds to a digital resolution of 8~10k
    35mm corresponds to a digital resolution of 4~6k
    16mm corresponds to a digital resolution of ~2k

    what I'm trying to say is that if a video was shot with 16mm film, it is also worth rescanning to HD to gain more quality.
     
  9. ThePixelFarm

    ThePixelFarm Livin' in a dream... Capper Uploader V . I . P. Collector Ripper Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Threads:
    1,128
    Messages:
    4,040
    Likes Received:
    21,670
    Yes, I suppose, that would work, looking at your figures...

    However, we could forget UHD (for 16mm), which you did mention, in your original first message...
     
  10. leonardol4e92

    leonardol4e92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2015
    Threads:
    184
    Messages:
    2,495
    Likes Received:
    2,625
    I don't know probably not cause they mastered all their videos in SD Betacam (but shooted on 35mm film), in order to get HD they would have to re-edit all the video over again and master it in HD
     
  11. Satya

    Satya Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2019
    Threads:
    12
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    128
  12. ThePixelFarm

    ThePixelFarm Livin' in a dream... Capper Uploader V . I . P. Collector Ripper Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Threads:
    1,128
    Messages:
    4,040
    Likes Received:
    21,670
    TV in the 1990s, definitely weren't broadcasting HD, trust me...

    Film stock, has always had much higher definition than video - certainly, up until, fairly recently...
     
  13. alyssaprimp

    alyssaprimp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2016
    Threads:
    29
    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    2,624
    ThePixelFarm likes this.
  14. xoxxxoooxo

    xoxxxoooxo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2018
    Threads:
    147
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    this is insane

    when i think of remasters of videos this is exactly what I'm hoping the quality would look like.

    I hope one day we get a lot old music videos in this same quality.
    still hoping for that IMAX version of thriller that was shown in theaters to hit the internet somehow
     
    mthsads and leonardol4e92 like this.
  15. NickiEX

    NickiEX Tele: @Nicki_EX Staff Member Super Moderator Uploader V . I . P.

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2014
    Threads:
    771
    Messages:
    3,239
    Likes Received:
    23,750
    simple, it costs too much
     
  16. leonardol4e92

    leonardol4e92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2015
    Threads:
    184
    Messages:
    2,495
    Likes Received:
    2,625
    Nah not that simple
     
  17. agnus2000

    agnus2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2018
    Threads:
    0
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    95
    Thanks
     
  18. Victor Whispers 02

    Victor Whispers 02 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2020
    Threads:
    0
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    22
  19. Andersontrsust88

    Andersontrsust88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2021
    Threads:
    0
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    97